18 Nov

Influential Catholic Christian Groups Support Obamacare Lawsuits

Last week, scores of influential Catholic and Christian groups publicly backed the principles underlying the lawsuits filed on May 21 by Catholic dioceses and groups against the Obamacare drug and device mandates. The announcements should add considerable pressure on the Obama White House to rescind or amend HHS regulations ordering faith-based groups to engage in health care activities totally contrary to the congregations’ religious doctrines.

On June 11, over 150 faith-based organizations joined in a letter to HHS Secretary Sebelius, expressing “grave concern” over the impact that the Obamacare mandate will have on religious freedom. The Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance, a Washington, D.C.-based coalition, organized the letter. It was signed by aid organizations, including World Relief and the U.S. branches of the Salvation Army and World Vision, Inc, as well as by the National Association of Evangelicals; the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference; the Baptist Bible College & Seminary; and the North American Baptist Conference. Legal organizations involved in lawsuits against the Obamacare mandate, such as Liberty Counsel and the American Center for Law and Justice, also signed the letter. They wrote:

As leaders and supporters of faith-based service organizations, we write to express our grave concern about the two-class concept of religious organizations that has been created by your department and other federal agencies in connection with the contraceptives mandate of the health insurance regulations for preventive services for women.

But we are united in opposition to the creation in federal law of two classes of religious organizations: churches–considered sufficiently focused inwardly to merit an exemption and thus full protection from the mandate; and faith-based service organizations–outwardly oriented and given a lesser degree of protection. It is this two-class system that the administration has embedded in federal law via the February 15, 2012, publication of the final rules providing for an exemption from the mandate for a narrowly defined set of “religious employers” and the related administration publications and statements about a different “accommodation” for non-exempt religious organizations.

On June 14, the Catholic Heath Association, the largest groups of Catholic-based hospitals in the U.S., delivered a crushing blow to any hopes that the Obamacare mandates would find any approval among leading Catholic-based organizations. The Catholic Health Association, the largest group of Catholic-affiliated hospitals and nursing homes in the country, issued a letter opposing the HHS mandate. The CHA’s opposition is especially damaging to the future of Obamacare because (a) it represents 600 hospitals and hundreds of nursing homes (one of every six patients in the U.S. is cared for in a Catholic hospital); and (b) it supported the enactment of Obamacare and was a key player in votes for the law by Catholic Democrats in the U.S. House.

CHA President, Sister Carol Keehan, wrote in the letter that, “we continue to believe that it is imperative for the Administration to abandon the narrow definition of “religious employer” and instead use an expanded definition to exempt from the contraceptive mandate not only churches, but also Catholic hospitals, health care organizations and other ministries of the Church.”

In other words, the Obamacare mandate would force CHA-member institutions to either turn away non-Catholic patients or close. That’s what numerous Catholic social services organizations have said – hospitals, nursing homes, AIDS clinics, and local clinics for the poor could all close.

These letters are precursors to the next stage of lawsuits against Obamacare by faith-based social service organizations, unless the White House amends or rescinds the current version of the mandate or the Supreme Court throws out the entire law.

The 43 Catholic dioceses, organizations and universities that sued the Obama administration on May 21 invoked their 7th Amendment rights and demanded that local juries hear the suits, not judges. It would be better if push doesn’t come to shove, but if it does, the nation will see why the Founding Fathers were unanimous in including this “sacred” and “inviolable” right in the Bill of Rights.

18 Nov

Paul Ryan Embraces Crony Politics Ditches Constitution in Budget

On Sunday, Rep. Paul Ryan promised, “No more crony politics” in his budget during TV interview. That promise lasted two days. Today, he released his budget, which would reward the pro-Obamacare (and pro-abortion) AMA and associated medical groups by capping what victims of healthcare malpractice can collect in lawsuits filed in state courts. Here’s the text on page 40 of Rep. Ryan’s draft budget for FY 2014:

“• Reform the medical liability system.
This budget also advances common-sense curbs on abusive and frivolous lawsuits. Medical lawsuits and excessive verdicts increase health-care costs and result in reduced access to care. When mistakes happen, patients have a right to fair representation and fair compensation. But the current tort litigation system too often serves the interests of lawyers while driving up costs. The budget supports several changes to laws governing medical liability, including limits on noneconomic and punitive damages.”

The plan ignores the opinions of the most respected Republican-side and libertarian legal experts who have repeatedly written that Congress has no authority to enact federal caps on medical malpractice lawsuits, especially under the majority opinion in the Supreme Court’s Obamacare opinion. Such a measure crushes states’ and individual rights and is an invalid exercise of the Commerce Clause.

The panoply of experts include Prof. Randy Barnett; Virginia AG Ken Cuccinelli; legal experts Rob Natelson, John Baker and Carrie Severino; and Reps. Ted Poe, Louie Gohmert and Lee Terry, and Senators Tom Coburn and Mike Lee. The National Conference of State Legislators has always protested federal caps as a violation of the states’ right to operate their civil justice systems without federal interference. Tea party leaders such as Judson Phillips and the Tea Party Patriots criticized the passage of caps by the Republican House in the last session of Congress.

And federal caps on medmal damages are not supported by leading Republican-side healthcare experts. Avik Roy, Jim Capretta and Tom Miller don’t include it in any of their recent proposals. They know federal caps on medmal lawsuits do nothing to help improve the quality of medical care.

The Ryan budget is nothing more than a sop to doctors, insurance companies, drug and device companies, and nursing homes, ALL of whom supported the enactment of Obamacare and approval by the Supreme Court. The lust for campaign dollars ignores the Constitution and realities in the healthcare marketplace.

Republicans should reject Ryan’s Crony Politics and vote with the Founding Fathers.

18 Nov

Dont Protect Gosnell Through Federal MedMal Limits

On November 20, 2009, 41-year-old Karnamaya Mongar made the wrong choice, a horrible decision that ended two lives that day. She chose to have an abortion at the clinic run by Dr. Kermit Gosnell in Philadelphia. Not only did Gosnell kill Mongar’s unborn baby, but he butchered her so she experienced severe pain, then shot her up with so many pain-killers that she died on the spot. The city of Philadelphia finally realized what Gosnell and his untrained, unlicensed staff have been doing in his “house of horrors” and indicted them for allegedly murdering multiple women and live babies. Mongar’s family hired a top-notch Philadelphia law firm and has filed a civil suit against Gosnell for medical malpractice.

But medical malpractice suits brought by families of other Gosnell victims could be severely limited in impact, and Gosnell allowed to keep much of his “blood money,” if federal limits are imposed for the first time on medical malpractice suits. The bill designated H.R. 5 will be debated and voted upon next week in the House Judiciary Committee. It would sharply limit non-economic and punitive damages, so Gosnell wouldn’t feel the sting of a jury verdict on his assets. And the bill would mandate that a jury sit there and listen to Gosnell as he tries to spread the blame for the deaths to his patients.

Ms. Mongar and the other women butchered in that clinic made the wrong decision, but that doesn’t justify murder. My view as a pro-life Christian is that Gosnell and his staff deprived the dead women of the opportunity to reclaim their lives and repent for the sin of the abortion – they took that away from their patients. The babies Gosnell killed, born and unborn, cannot take his blood money away. Only the families of the women who were mutilated by Gosnell can ensure he is punished financially so he can’t just access his assets someday and start over. Congress shouldn’t protect Gosnell from justice, delivered by a local jury in a court of law.

18 Nov

On the List St Patricks Day

I’m sort of ambivalent about my ambivalence toward St. Patrick’s Day. On the one hand, it’s obviously fucking stupid. On the other, it’s really fucking stupid, so it’s kind of hard to strike the right balance of feigned superiority that I’m known by literally tens of people for. But anything that brings together the holy trinity of List ridiculousness: Religion, Nationalism and Getting Wasted, Dude! altogether in one spectacular shit show is ripe for scorn. When you add in other reliable List-worthy staples like Boston, the Irish, Irish-Americans, parades, having fun, doing stuff, and being sociable with other people, well, it deserves a special rung of its own in List hell. The only way it could be worse is if it was a day where everyone pretended really hard right in your face to be Italian.


I think we can all agree that no matter how bad St. Patrick’s Day is, at least we dodged a bullet on that one.

The reason it doesn’t bother me too much though is because, as a reasonable person, I don’t even really know that it exists. I don’t go to Southie to watch the parade. I don’t go to watch any parade for that matter. I’d rather see a column of stormtroopers marching down the street to my front door with burning torches and laser shields than be subjected to that particular drunken brand of artistry that comprises everything contemptible about ethnic pride and displays of military prowess. (Marching bands are kind of cool though, just saying.)

And unlike every other night of the year I will make the reasonable decision to avoid bars tonight. Why? Because I am not a fucking moron. Also I don’t like standing in lines, being around ridiculous people, or taking part in forced displays of camaraderie. I don’t like watching people puke, get in fights and singing old timey Irish folk songs either. If I wanted to take part in any of that shit I wouldn’t have quit going to AA meetings with your sister.

So, I don’t know. Go celebrate it if you want. It’s your stupid life. But do me a favor, every couple hours or so, in between spilling sips of green water-colored beer piss on your green Cosby sweater, think about this: St. Patrick wasn’t even Irish. Dude was born in Roman Briton. Also there were never any snakes in Ireland. Also taxes are due in a couple weeks and we’re all going to die some day, most likely in pain and alone.

Anyway, have fun having fun. See you tomorrow for the post-game wrap up. I wanna hear all about it.

18 Nov

Jesus Wrote the Declaration of Independence

Making fun of conservative art is kind of like shooting retarded fish in a retarded barrel, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything that so comprehensively captures the experience of being completely clueless about everything that has ever happened ever. I am literally in awe of this painting’s majesty, and no I’m not talking about the hippie cosplay dude ignoring that kid in the middle. 

So, obviously, Jesus wrote the rules of America and Abe Lincoln and an astronaut and Kevin Spacey were all there. Everyone agrees on that. What you may not have known, if you look a little closer here on the bottom right, is that pregnant sluts, jew lawyers, the liberal media, pointy headed professors with their fancy science-y books and, what, Jeff Bridges in a blazer I guess, are all bros with Satan. 

This shit is a little internet old, but true art is timeless, right? Here’s where my man explains the whole thing, complete with captions for each figure, like the Civil War soldier with his hands over his face. Why? “Because that was the only war in American history where American fought against American and brother fought against brother. Hopefully it will never happen again.” Unless the liberals try to steal our machine guns he probably meant to add. So, go check it out. Meet you back here in ten years when you recover.

AllBlogToolsFacebook comments for blogger brought to you by AllBlogTools.com , Get Yours?
18 Nov

Doubling Up at Dunkin Donuts

Dunkin Donuts is a veritable treasure trove for a “list” blogger. We’ve already covered the people getting milkshakes and pretending they’re coffees and we’ve probably already covered the idea of eating donuts(if we haven’t, we should.)

Anyway, I go to the Dunky D’s the other day for an iced coffee and a bagel on the way to work (on a Saturday — speaking of the list), when two events take place that make me Jesus to turn my hands into hammers so I can smash everything in sight.

First: two dudes discussing this Obammer v. the Cambridge Police thing. Dude A says the Big O was wrong to douche on the cops. Fair enough. Sensing another possible racist in his presence, Dude B puts it on the line: “the only thing I’ve seen since he got elected is more taxes and more blacks.” Aside from that dickhead’s taxes actually going down, what does that second bit even mean? Whatever. I was in Dunky’s, and this is the price you pay for bro-ing down with the common man, is it not?

Second: a dude strolls in in his saturday best(jean shorts and a tank-top) orders an iced coffee and asks for a styrofoam cup to put the plastic cup in. Thanks, bro. Think you can just dump your garbage in front of the store and idle your enormous truck for a few minutes? Maybe club a baby seal on the way out the door in case you haven’t destroyed the Earth enough for the day? Wouldn’t want your precious hand to get wet from that ice sweat though. Hey did you know back when I was a kid, they didn’t even have cupholders that would hold drinks that big? Yeah, weird one, right?

There you have it. There’s your average hockey mom or Joe the Plumber just gettin’ ‘er done for the American Dream at a Dunky’s near you. Should’ve stuck to Starbucks, which despite what you’re thinking, is NOT on the list.

18 Nov


I’m not a barber, I’m a hairdresser or “stylist” or whatever faggy-sounding thing you want to call it. I have a cosmetology license, and part of my beauty school training was in doing mani/pedis, applying makeup, doing up-dos and perms, all that masculine stuff.

My dad still has issues with calling me a hairdresser when people ask him what his son does. I think a typical exchange with him is something like: “My son cuts hair.” “Oh, he’s a barber?” “No, he’s a hairdresser, but he’s not gay.” Cutting hair in general seems to be a big Italian thing though for some reason, like Koreans do nails and Eastern Europeans do waxing, not sure why that is. My motivation for becoming a hair-person was that I graduated from an unremarkable state college with an unremarkable GPA in my English degree right around the time the dot com bubble burst, followed by 9/11, and trying to live off freelance writing jobs and entry-level publishing grunt-work kind of sucked, as did the administrative office job I ended up doing for three years while trying to figure out what to do with myself.

18 Nov

All I Need To Know About Ministry I Learned From Fly Fishing

All I Need To Know About Ministry I Learned From Fly Fishing
95 pages
Judson Press (www.judsonpress.com)
ISBN: 0-8170-1396-2

By Myrlene L. J.Hamilton

I have read that one sign of insanity is when you do the same thing over and over again while expecting different results. I don’t know about you, but to me that sounds like the perfect description of fishing.

On an evening in late May, my husband, Ed, and I were fly fishing on the West Branch of the Delaware River in New York. Along with several diehards, we were flailing the water repeatedly, with no results. We kept doing it anyway. Late in the evening, an older gentleman came along with his fly rod and just sat down on the bank, watching the river. I wondered why he wasn’t flailing the water along with the rest of us. Bored with my own lack of action, I went over to speak to him. He told me about the big one he had caught the night before, right in that same spot. Then he pointed to the river. He said, “See that big rock out there? There’s a big trout lying right beside it. And there’s another one over there and another one over there. When it’s just about dark, I’ll have about a ten-minute window when they start to rise.”

Meekly I asked him, “And when they start to rise, what will they be taking?”

“Rusty spinners,” he said.

I went back to my fishing, but kept the old man within eyesight. For luck, I tied on a rusty spinner and resumed my flailing. A few minutes later, I saw a splash in the vicinity of one of his big fish. He was talking with someone else at the moment, so I kindly pointed out to him that maybe it was time to start fishing.

He took his rod, stepped out in the river, and cast a couple of times. Then he came back in and said, “No point killing myself before it’s time.” And he sat back down. I went upriver, keeping him in view. The sun went down, and the sky darkened. Finally, the old man unfolded himself, stretched and stepped into the river. He made one cast, and a fish rose, grabbed that rusty spinner, and snapped off the leader. I don’t know what the old man did then because I, along with the other flailers, reeled in and went back to the cabin.

In fishing, it seems that there is always someone who knows the magic–the magic spot, the magic fly, the magic time of day. And it’s always someone else.

In ministry, there are often similar frustrations. We keep doing what we do (sometimes ad nauseum) with marginal success, while our colleague down the street, or in the next town, reels in the big ones with seemingly little or no effort. Our neighbor’s creel is full, while ours remains pitifully empty.

But magic has little if anything to do with catching fish, or with being successful in ministry. In fly fishing, you have to learn the ways of the river and the ways the fish interact with their environment, especially the insects. You need to spend time, not just in books, but out on the river, watching, learning, flailing. In time, what seems like magic becomes almost second nature. In ministry, too, it’s not just book learning but education on the river that yields maturity and success. One whose calling is to fish for people must find the answers to some pertinent questions. What are people hungry for? What are their great desires? Where do they spend their time? How do they respond to various kinds of “bait”? More than that, the one who is called to fish for people must spend time out on the river with the One who created the fish and the bugs and the river itself.

Fishing or Not

Let’s begin at the beginning. If the fisher of persons wants to find success in ministry, the first question to ask is, “Am I fishing or not?” Because we are preaching every week, visiting people in the hospital, and teaching Bible studies, we tend to think we are fishing. But we may just be dangling our toes in the water and getting a tan. Ed and I choose our fishing spots not just for the quality of the fishing but also for the quality of the environment. If we find a place we like, we tend to go back again and again. It becomes like a mini-home away from home where we go to get away from it all. On the first evening, we unpack and unwind. We may not get our fishing gear out until the next day. Sometimes we will go through a whole week without fishing very hard. We just like being there–being quiet, watching the river go by, letting down. And that’s okay, until someone asks us how the fishing is going. “Oh, it’s a little slow,” we might say vaguely. Truth is, it’s not going at all. We’re just coasting. Oh, we’ll get around to fishing, once we’re done with our loafing.

That’s okay for vacationers, but such coasting should not be confused with fishing.

What’s true for many ministers (both clergy and laity) is that we’re vacationing instead of fishing. We are very busy doing many things, and we are enjoying each other, enjoying the river going by. At the same time, our community is growing, the population burgeoning. The schools are overcrowded. “Why aren’t some of those people coming to our church?” we ask. Well, it just could be that we aren’t fishing. We’re just sitting on the porch, sipping sarsaparilla with our friends, having a great time.

When Jesus said to Peter, “From now on you will be catching people,” he wasn’t joking. That’s our job.

I don’t say that to spark guilt in those who live in declining communities or rural areas, where there are few unchurched people to reach. Not every church is meant to be a megachurch. But churches are meant to grow, both in spiritual maturity and in numbers. Something should be happening out there.

Fishing or Catching

There are lots of styles of fishing. You can fish with a bobber and a worm on the end of a long string; you can walk along a stream with a fly rod; you can troll your spinner behind a boat; out in the ocean you can let your line go way down deep with heavy weights and bait; you can use a dip net or a spear. You can fish with worms, or squid, or spinners, or flies.

While there is an endless array of fishing styles, there are only two types of fishing. One is where you go fishing and don’t catch anything. The other is fishing and catching.

Fishing and not catching is something I know a lot about. In fact, this kind of fishing is very popular with many people. And it’s easy to master. You don’t have to bother learning a whole lot about the environment or the equipment or the fish. Just go fishing and see what happens. Good luck.

In some ways, this is the best kind of fishing because you can have a nice day outdoors, and when you come in, there are no stinking, slimy fish to clean. At the heart, it’s a whole lot like not fishing–though you are out there making a good show of it. There are hazards, though. Just when you think you are going to make it through the day and not catch anything, there’s a tug on the line. Then what do you do?

A lot of churches are like that. They’re out there fishing, all right, but not much is happening, and when they do get a strike, they don’t know what to do. And more often than not they spook the fish. A church that we served a few years ago said that they wanted to get more young families in the church, and that was one thing that drew us there to serve as their pastors. The problem was that whenever a young family would come, they would get “the stare.” Sometimes, if they had a restless young child, they would even get “the boot.” “The cry room is upstairs,” one couple was told rather gruffly by an older member of the church. The young couple never came back.

Catch and Release

For those who are committed to fishing and catching, there is one more critical decision: catch and kill or catch and release?

Catching and killing is no doubt the more popular of the two because most of us want to bring home a trophy–and lots of us like to eat fish. If we were to translate this into our church work, we may think that we are gathering up all those fish for our own benefit, our own use. We want to catch more people because we need more money in the offering plate, or we need more teachers, or more whatever. I suspect that we have all seen churches that are really good at the catch-and-kill kind of fishing. They reel everybody in, sit them down, and then squeeze all the enthusiasm and creativity and life out of them–or else bore them to death. Someone once said that the only real heresy is to make the gospel boring. Amen to that! God is anything but boring.

Sometimes when we hear about fishing for people, we are afraid it’s the catch-and-kill type. I think this is one reason why evangelism is something that people tend to avoid. It has a predatory feel to it. But this is not the kind of fishing that Jesus invites us to participate in.

The kind of fishing that Jesus wants to teach us is catch and release. I started to learn about catch and release at about the same time I was learning fly fishing. A favorite fishing stream in Oregon, the Metolius, has beautiful native rainbow trout cohabitating with hatchery-raised planters. If you catch one of the natives, you are required by law to respect that fish’s right to life and let it go back into the stream. (Hatchery-raised fish have the adipose fin clipped off.) To make it easier on the fish, you have to use flies only and barbless hooks.

When Jesus spoke to Simon about catching people (Luke 5:10), the word translated as “catching” literally means to take them alive. Catch and release. Reel them in for Jesus Christ and the kingdom of God, and then set them loose to become what God has called them to become. In our church’s vision statement, we say that we want to help people “meet Jesus Christ and grow spiritually.” That’s the fishing and catching part. Then we say that we want to “enable each person to discover and enter into the unique ministry God has given him or her.” That’s the release part. Each person is unique and is valued by God. Each person has a special calling from God. We don’t want to force people into molds because when we do that, we just get (excuse the old joke) moldy Christians.

This kind of fishing is risky business because people may not become what we want them to become, and we may not fill all the “slots” on our nominating slate. These folks may even create new ministries that we had never even dreamed of. God forbid, they may even take what they learn from us and go and join a different church!

Even so, I have come to believe that the chief end of fishing is catch and release. Our “fish” may not turn out the way we thought, but they’ll become what God wants them to be, and so will we.

Excerpted From All I Need to Know About Ministry I Learned from Fly Fishing by Myrlene L. J. Hamilton. ©2001 by Judson Press, Valley Forge, Pa. Reprinted with permission. To order call (800) 458-3766 or visit www.judsonpress.com.  ($12.00)

Share this article: Email,
Slashdot, Digg,
Del.icio.us, Yahoo!MyWeb,
Windows Live Favorites,
Add this article feed to: RSS, My Yahoo, Newsgator, Bloglines

Read Comments [0]

18 Nov

Architectural Outlook 2007

by RaeAnn Slaybaugh

Architectural Outlook: 2007
Construction and Design Experts Discuss This Year’s 7 Biggest Trends for Churches

by RaeAnn Slaybaugh

Youth Facilities Still Top the Trends List

Bill Chegwidden: First, you have to take care of the youth. When you’re in middle school, you want an activity to do when you come to church. You want to throw a basketball or something. And when you’re a high school student, you want somebody to sit down and talk to. It’s about a relationship. You want a place to hang out. I think we’re beginning to understand how to design for those ages.

Doug Akers: Families have their kids in great preschools during the week. When they bring them to church, they expect no less than that — uniforms on the workers, pagers and so on. A lot of churches we deal with give out PDA’s with Wi-Fi cards in them! Parents can literally see their children through a camera in the room they’re in.

We’re seeing a lot of children’s theaters, whether it’s for children’s worship or for mid-week events. Sometimes Awana circles are built right into the carpet. These are spaces for innovative children’s worship.

Mark Hilles: There’s a sustained movement in youth and children’s facilities. Most of the pastors we talk to see these as vehicles to get families in their churches. They feel if they don’t have that, they’ll be bare.

David Evans: There’s recognition among churches that they have to have state-of-the-art, high-quality children’s spaces. They have to say to parents, ‘We care about your kids.’ A lot of kids are bringing their parents to church, so those spaces are big.

Multifunction, Multipurpose, Multi- Venue, Multi-Site

Derik Salser: Until you’re ready to build a big worship center, a multipurpose space is a great idea. When the time comes, a lot of old multipurpose buildings are turned into the youth centers. When the church builds its big, 2,000-seat sanctuary, the youth are going to take that old building, and they’re going to love it. They’ll put their bands up there on stage!

Akers: We’re seeing more and more moveable wall panel systems installed. So, a space may be an education building on Sunday morning, but on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday, it can be set up for an aerobics class or a fellowship supper.

More and more churches are doing multifunction worship spaces. Not necessarily recreation, not so much a gym — but multifunction so they can do worship services in there. They’ll set up interlocking chairs and tables and do a seminar, or they can set it up for a banquet. If there’s a smaller fellowship hall close by and a commercial kitchen, they can use that space in multiple ways.

Viviana Varnado: The answer might not always be, ‘Let’s build a new church.’ In some cases, an evaluation and space assessment may reveal a different solution. We have encountered cases where we went into a facility which had 2,000 square feet of space that they were not using. An evaluation of your existing space based on your ministry needs is very important since it will clearly indicate deficiencies and opportunities. See what you have today, and work from there.

Erwin: The satellite church revolution will become a viable option. [Pastor] Ed Young’s comments are right on the money: You don’t have to spend a lot of money on these venues, but you have to do things well. That means no handwritten signs, fresh paint, making sure things are clean.

Doug Spuler: To meet the needs of different worship styles, churches are looking at implementing and using video venues. Multiple auditoriums with 1,000 to 2,000 seats will allow a church to offer more diversity in worship while delivering the same message to each venue.

Stephen Ferrandi: Architecturally, we have a couple of church clients that don’t want to look like churches at all. One is building a 2,000-seat sanctuary, and they’ve told me from day one they want it to look like a banquet hall. They’re coming out of a warehouse that looks like a warehouse, so maybe it’s just part of their process.

Erwin: With the pressure that prices are putting on churches, I believe we’ll see more functional buildings built, which means a lot more rectangular or square buildings. Churches can put more space for less money in a rectangular building. I think you’ll see multi-use facility — with flat floors and moveable furniture — become increasingly popular, certainly for first phases.

Evans: I think the worship auditorium environment is becoming a little smaller and a little more intimate. We’re sometimes seeing three or four small auditoriums on the same campus instead of one large one.

Churches Must Act Like Good Neighbors

Ferrandi: It used to be that if you wanted to build a church — not a megachurch, just a church — people didn’t fight you. And now, if you want to build a church of any size, you can expect it. I tell my clients to budget three years from the day they put down a contract to the day they break ground — to get through the entitlement process and a couple of public hearings. That gives them time to raise the money, hire the contractor, etc., ahead of time.

Akers: When working with churches in areas where there’s been a lot of construction, there are lots of nice new homes. Well, you can’t go in and put up a pre-engineered building because people just walked out of those beautiful homes! They’ll want a building that fits in.

Remodeling, Renovation On the Rise

Brad Eisenmann: Whereas before the mindset was, ‘We have this church that can’t be expanded because we’re in a neighborhood, so we’re going to move out to the freeway and build a new church,’ now — with the multi-site movement gaining ground — people are saying, ‘Lets’ stay here!’ Rather than selling the church and building a bigger one, churches are deciding to keep it, remodel it, renovate it, and then plant a second, third or fourth site.

Greg Snider: I’m noticing a huge awareness that facilities matter. There are churches in communities of half-million-dollar homes, but the church itself hasn’t been touched in 20 years. So, existing churches that aren’t growing are changing so they can grow. They’re making their facilities more relevant. Now more than ever, a lot of facilities are irrelevant in today’s culture. People are walking in and walking out.

Traditional Design Elements Make a Comeback

Hilles: I think there’s a collision of thought about contemporary, non-discrete, commercial-looking, seeker-sensitive churches. I wouldn’t say there’s a lot of traditional pursuit of steeples and those kinds of traditional elements, but I do think churches are looking for an identifying point of interest or feature that gives people a reference point about what they’re doing — almost like a corporate branding.

Varnado: Newer generations are seeking more of an intimate environment — less the stadium kind of feel — when they’re at church. They want personal relationships, they want to get to know people. There are ways to do that it in a stadium-type venue, but some people are looking for something a little more intimate and not as large.

Chegwidden: More and more churches want some elements that have traditional flavor to them. A lot feel like they’ve gone too far and given up too much of that. And the people coming back want something they remember from their childhood — the ancient and the modern. We’re trying to find a new balance.

Higher Land and Construction Costs

Ferrandi: The land cost dictates what a church can realistically build, so some churches are building sanctuaries that can hold 500 people on day one, but they have knock-out walls so they can be expanded later.

Akers: We have to be competitive with what people are seeing in their everyday lives, and that means our facilities must be competitive. That’s pushing up the cost of construction. We’re looking at about $20 more per square foot to build this year than in 2006. With technology thrown in there, it might even be 20% to 25% more.

Barron: There’s a healthy tension in the market right now because prices have gone up 25% over the last two years. You’re not buying the same amount you did two years ago. Fortunately, a lot of the giving patterns have increased along with the cost increase.

Building Community with Design

Varnado: One of the biggest design trends we’re seeing today is the sense of community people are integrating into their churches — foyers, large gathering spaces, coffee shops, cafes. Creating spaces that welcome visitors, the unchurched and members, making them feel comfortable, is a trend that we are seeing develop across denominations, for high church to very casual church groups. It is here to stay.

Snider: I’m seeing a major breakdown of the ‘institution’ — a lot fewer classrooms and four walls created for one specific ministry. It’s about creating a community area now, where we can spontaneously break into a small group in an area of the church that isn’t necessarily a classroom.

Eisenmann: A lot of churches are thinking outside their buildings. A great example of this is a church we built in a retail area and designed not to look like a church, but fit into the retail context. People come in to ask if it’s the library. When they find out it’s not, they’ll still sit down, get a cup of coffee, visit the bookstore, and interact with the personnel anyway. They connect. The ‘third place’ concept thing is becoming much more of a topic. The first place is your home, the second place is your work, and the third place is where everybody knows your name.

Evans: Connection spaces are a big trend — it’s the ‘third place’ concept of how we can connect with people, spawned from secular society. People can literally come to the church and hang out there all day. Connectivity is still really big and important, and I don’t see that changing.

18 Nov

A Need-to-Know Guide Pirates in Our Midst

by Ken Godevenos

Would you allow your staff members to attack each other, taking one another’s belongings without permission? Many would respond, “No way! That’s piracy!” — and they would be right. But in the late 20th century, the word “piracy” began to be associated with the simple “unauthorized use or reproduction of another’s work or product without their awareness and permission.” One common form of piracy is associated with the inappropriate use of software.

Also getting a lot of press these days is the related concept of “plagiarism,” which takes piracy one step beyond stealing to actually passing off the work (most often words penned by another person) as one’s own. In our preaching, most of us are quick to say, “I didn’t say that, Jesus said it,” or “the Bible says it – don’t blame me.” (This was a hot-button issue in one of my blog posts, “Whose Sermon Is It Anyway?”) But we are not as quick or as careful to give credit to others when we use their examples or arguments or make points they originally made.

A third area of concern today is violation of copyright. Most dictionaries define “copyright” as “the exclusive legal right, given to an originator or assignee (e.g. an author’s estate or agent or family) to print, publish, perform, film or record literary, artistic or musical material, and to authorize others to do the same.”

So, do we have any pirates in our midst? Before we continue, it must be stated that this is a very complex area – there are no black and whites, and as we’ll see later, there are some exceptions, especially for nonprofit organizations. The law itself is not as clear as some of us would like it to be. Ultimately, it becomes a matter of ethical behavior and how we ourselves would like to be treated. Here are just some ways church staff may be acting like pirates, plagiarists and copyright violators:

•Plagiarism in our sermons, talks, presentations .Remember – you can use the work of others, provided you give them credit.

•The use of music or songs without paying royalties. Every church should be licensed through Christian Copyright Licensing International, which streamlines copyright issues surrounding congregational worship services.

•The use of lended technology, usually software, which has been purchased by an individual or a company other than the church for one’s own personal or business use.

•The unauthorized photocopying of pages from purchased books for sharing with the staff or those we are working with. People have been known to copy entire chapters of books each week for the members of various classes that they teach because the church does not supply – or members cannot afford or will not buy – the books for themselves. In some cases, entire books have been copied.

•The use of movie clips taken from our own purchased copies of movies for personal use or downloaded from the Internet. Worse still is the use of an entire movie in one of our programs (e.g. youth) that has been copied illegally or downloaded from the Internet …


Pages: 1 2Next